Urban congestion and rapidly increasing population mobility have created a favorable environment for portable housing, particularly those designed for removable housing. The market for American container homes and prefabricated houses offers a stark contrast between the new and existing types. These two types of buildings differ significantly in their construction methods and performance. Below, I will provide a detailed introduction:
First, in terms of construction, container homes are a standard practice. They utilize various materials, with all components manufactured in a factory and transported to the site for immediate lifting. They are easy to install, highly reliable, and easily assembled and disassembled, allowing for repeated use. Traditional prefabricated steel houses, on the other hand, are assembled and welded on-site according to customer requirements. This takes longer and is less reliable. When combined with concrete, they can exceed the specified strength and cannot be reused after disassembly.
Second, in terms of living characteristics, container buildings are made of environmentally friendly materials and are designed with a high center and low perimeter, making them less prone to leaks. Due to the variety of its specifications, models and styles, its application scope is no longer limited to construction sites. Many office buildings and temporary housing have begun to use living containers. However, due to the limitations of the materials used, traditional color steel houses have poor fire resistance and poor thermal insulation. They are also not very comfortable to live in during the summer and cannot be used again after disassembly, which is a serious waste.
